by David Korzinski | October 3, 2017 7:30 pm
October 4, 2017 – With roughly a year to go before the next provincial election, Quebec residents are overwhelmingly supportive of their current government’s efforts to ban the receiving or administering of public services with a covered face, but most disapprove of its response to this summer’s surge in irregular border-crossings.
According to the Angus Reid Institute’s latest analysis of quarterly public opinion polling data, some one-in-five Quebecers say each of these issues will be “one of the most important” when making their decision on who to vote for in 2018.
On religious accommodation, fully six-in-ten Quebecers “strongly support” the proposed law that critics – particularly those elsewhere in Canada – say amounts to discrimination against Muslim women.
There is much less consensus in Quebec society around the provincial government’s handling of the border issue. Some 60 per cent disapprove of Premier Philippe Couillard’s response to the situation, a total slightly higher than the number who disapprove of the premier’s performance overall (54%).
Related: Premiers’ Performance: As Horgan enters office on a high, Wall is set to depart on top
The religious neutrality legislation currently being debated in the National Assembly is only the latest in a series of efforts to codify the Quebec’s longstanding commitment to the separation of church and state, and to determine what accommodations – if any – should be made to orthodox religious minorities living in the province.
The previous Parti Québécois government’s ill-fated Charter of Values sought to enshrine the secularism that has pervaded Quebec politics since the Quiet Revolution by prohibiting all public employees in the province from wearing “conspicuous” religious symbols while on the job. Angus Reid polling from 2009 found significant support for such a requirement, and later polling in 2013 found Quebecers believing their society was “too accommodating” of religious practices.
Couillard’s Liberal Party won the 2014 election after campaigning against the proposed charter, and his government’s introduction of Bill 62 – which addresses some of the same issues – has raised eyebrows outside the province.
In comparison to previous legislation, Bill 62 is more modest in scope, prohibiting only face-coverings such as niqabs and burkas, but extending the prohibition to people receiving public sector services, as well as those public employees administering them. Like previous efforts, Bill 62 has caused controversy, with recent amendments extending the face-covering prohibition to municipal governments and transit authorities prompting sharp criticism from Montreal Mayor Denis Coderre.
So, where do Quebecers stand? This polling data finds the vast majority of them strongly in favour of the proposed law, with francophone respondents especially supportive:
*small sample size
Overall support among French-speakers tops nine-in-ten (91%), while it reaches two-in-three (67%) among anglophones. Note the relatively small number of mother-tongue-English-speakers in the province. Roughly 10 per cent of Quebecers name English as their primary language.
This greater enthusiasm for the legislation among francophones is likely related to Quebec’s historical position as a distinct society within Canada, with its own culture, traditions, and norms. Being majority French-speaking is a key component of this distinct Quebec culture, of course, and so is believing that the state must remain explicitly secular. Insofar as Bill 62 is perceived to maintain or enhance that secularity, it may also be perceived as maintaining or enhancing Quebecois culture.
That said, many critics – especially those outside the province – have argued support for the bill could also be rooted in racism and xenophobia.
Younger Quebecers (those ages 18 – 34) are more tepid in their support for the legislation, as seen in the graph that follows, though they still support it by a three-to-one margin (74% to 26%) overall.
While the National Assembly debates religious accommodation in Quebec City, the province’s southern border has spent much of 2017 as the epicentre of a debate about a different sort of accommodation.
More than 13,000 people have crossed the border outside of official border crossings to seek asylum in Canada this year, and the vast majority of those have done so in Lacolle, Que.
Walking across the border outside of an official point of entry allows would-be refugees to circumvent the Safe Third Country Agreement, which prohibits people who are already in the United States from making a refugee claim in Canada – the idea being that the U.S. is a safe country and they should make their claim there instead. Those who try to enter Canada from the U.S. at an official border crossing or airport and claim asylum will be turned away under the agreement, but if they arrive in Canada without going through an official crossing, they are allowed to submit a refugee claim.
The number of irregular border-crossings peaked in August, when hundreds of people crossed daily. The situation led some MPs to call for the suspension of the Safe Third Country Agreement, while others called for the designation of the Lacolle crossing as an official point of entry, which would allow Canada to turn away the asylum seekers who arrived there.
The border issue has become a subject of political debate in Quebec as well, with Couillard appealing to residents’ “deep sense of equality and compassion” for the new arrivals, while also discouraging would-be refugees from crossing the border illegally and assuming their applications for status will be approved.
Opposition parties have criticized the government’s handling of the situation, arguing that an independent Quebec would have greater control over its border and could abandon the Safe Third Country Agreement, which would make the process more orderly.
Asked for their opinion, most Quebec residents say they disapprove of the provincial government’s handling of the situation, including a plurality who “strongly disapprove,” as seen in the following graph:
The 60 per cent who disapprove of the Quebec government’s handling of the situation echo the sentiments expressed nationally about the federal government’s response. When the Angus Reid Institute asked all Canadians about the issue in August, close to six-in-ten (57%) said they disapproved of the Trudeau government’s handling of the situation.
Related: Half of Canadians say their country is ‘too generous’ toward illegal border crossers
Again, language is a significant fault-line on this issue within Quebec. A majority (57%) of English-speaking Quebecers approve of the Couillard government’s response to the surge in irregular border-crossings, while nearly two-thirds of francophones (64%) disapprove:
*small sample size
There are also notable differences on this question along educational and gender lines, with men and those with university degrees more likely to approve of the government’s performance:
Asked what effect each of these issues – Bill 62 and irregular border-crossings – will have on their vote in the 2018 Quebec election, one-in-five (19%), say Bill 62 will be “one of the most important factors” in the decision of which party to support. Nearly one-in-four (23%) say the same of the border issue.
Fewer than one-sixth of respondents say either issue will not be a factor in their vote, and the plurality view in each case is that the topic will be part of a suite of “somewhat important” issues that come to mind when entering the voting booth:
The percentage of respondents saying each of these topics is likely to be an important factor in their choice of party next year is fairly consistent across demographic groups. The most notable differences are between younger and older generations, with the latter placing more weight on each of these issues:
Asked to name the top issue facing the province, one-in-three Quebecers choose health care – three times as many as report any other issue rising to the top of their minds:
If the Couillard government is benefitting politically from the strong consensus of support for Bill 62, the benefits are not manifesting themselves in job performance approval for the premier.
Most Quebec residents (54%) disapprove of their province’s current leader, while slightly more than one-in-three (35%) approve – a rating that has remained fairly consistent over the last two years:
While the premier’s approval might be described as uninspiring, this poll finds little advantage for the leaders and spokespeople of opposition parties in public perception of their job performance.
Parti Québécois leader Jean-François Lisée and Coalition Avenir Québec leader François Legault have each criticized Couillard for his handling of the border, but neither leader enjoys the approval of a majority of Quebecers. Indeed, among all party leaders and spokespeople, only Legault has a positive net approval – meaning the percentage of people who approve of him is higher than the percentage who disapprove:
Whether Legault can build on this momentum and lead the CAQ to form government for the first time in 2018 remains to be seen.
The Angus Reid Institute (ARI) was founded in October 2014 by pollster and sociologist, Dr. Angus Reid. ARI is a national, not-for-profit, non-partisan public opinion research foundation established to advance education by commissioning, conducting and disseminating to the public accessible and impartial statistical data, research and policy analysis on economics, political science, philanthropy, public administration, domestic and international affairs and other socio-economic issues of importance to Canada and its world.
Shachi Kurl, Executive Director: 604.908.1693 email@example.com @shachikurl
Ian Holliday, Research Associate: 604.442.3312 firstname.lastname@example.org
Click here for the full report including tables and methodology
Source URL: https://angusreid.org/quebec-provincial-issues-sept/
Copyright ©2019 Angus Reid Institute unless otherwise noted.