by David Korzinski | March 23, 2017 10:30 am
March 20, 2017 – As the federal government prepares to release its second budget since winning the 2015 election on a promise to run “modest deficits,” a new analysis of polling data by the Angus Reid Institute finds deficits and government spending increasingly on the minds of many Canadians.
The Institute’s latest quarterly analysis of public opinion data from more than 5,400 Canadian adults finds deficits and spending to be the third most-mentioned concern when Canadians are canvassed on the most important issues in the country today, behind only health care and the economy in general. Moreover, the number of respondents naming the deficit as a top concern has nearly doubled since Justin Trudeau’s government took office.
That said, the Prime Minister himself remains popular. More than half of all Canadians say they approve of his performance, though relatively few do so “strongly.”
In late August 2015, with his Liberal Party running a sometimes-distant third in the polls, Justin Trudeau announced that his government – if he formed one – would run “modest deficits” of $10 billion or less each year, and return to a balanced budget by 2019-20. The deficit spending would fuel investment in infrastructure, which would create jobs, Trudeau promised.
Trudeau’s opponents were highly critical of the plan, but an Angus Reid Institute poll during the campaign found Canadians open to the concept of deficit spending as a means of stimulating the economy:
When it became apparent last year that the new Liberal government was considering breaking its promise to keep deficits to $10 billion or less, the Angus Reid Institute asked Canadians a more specific question, and found a more mixed result. At the time, only one-in-five (22%) were willing to see the government exceed the $10 billion cap:
When the Trudeau government tabled its first budget, it projected a deficit of nearly $30 billion, and did not project a return to balanced budgets by 2020.
While the total deficit for the current fiscal year is now projected to be somewhat smaller than originally expected, it’s still much larger than the initial promise, and Canadians have been growing more wary of the government’s increasing deficit spending.
As seen in the graph that follows, roughly one-in-eight Canadians (12%) considered deficits to be one of the most important issues facing the country in December 2015, shortly after the Trudeau government took office. Since then, the percentage of Canadians identifying budget shortfalls as a top issue has almost doubled:
This increase in the number of Canadians expressing concern about government spending comes against the same backdrop of economic anxiety that has been the norm for the entirety of the Trudeau government – and indeed, for several years prior to that. This economic picture will be discussed in greater detail in the following section.
Rising concern over budget deficits isn’t inherently a problem for the government. It does have the potential to become a problem, however, if the government’s efforts on the economic file don’t start to correspond with a turnaround in Canadians’ perceptions of the economy.
If the government is looking for signs that Canadians are feeling better about the economy, it might take heart in the decrease in the number of Canadians who think their standard of living has worsened in the last year.
While Canadians remain more likely to say things have worsened for them in the last 12 months than to say they’ve improved, the percentage saying the former has decreased six percentage points since last quarter, and the number saying their standard of living has stayed the same has grown correspondingly:
As the graph indicates, the percentage of Canadians who say their standard of living is worse now than it was a year ago has never been lower in this survey, and the percentage who say their standard of living has remained the same has never been higher.
The growth in the number of Canadians saying things have stayed the same for them over the last 12 months also corresponds with an uptick in the percentage who expect things to stay the same over the next 12, as seen in the graph that follows.
While responses to these two questions could hardly be described as “optimistic,” they are certainly more positive than Canadians have been when it comes to their household economic situations in quite some time.
This isn’t necessarily cause for celebration, however. The fact that this decrease in the number of people who say things are worsening doesn’t correspond with a significant increase in the number who say things are improving may suggest that Canadians are adjusting to a “new normal” rather than seeing actual economic improvement in their lives. A look at household debt in Canada is particularly illuminating. Low interest rates and subsequent borrowing have led to all-time highs in this key debt ratio.
At a macro level, the economy remains Canadians’ top area of concern, with 30 per cent saying it is one of the top issues facing the country today. Likewise, Canadians are more likely to say they are dissatisfied with the economy than to say they’re satisfied with it, continuing a pattern that has held since the first quarter of 2015:
Of course, economic anxiety is unevenly distributed around the country. Canadians are slightly more likely to say they expect the national economy to worsen (32%) than to improve (28%) over the next 12 months, but views on the futures of Canada’s various provincial economies vary significantly, as seen in the following graph:
Albertans, perhaps feeling buoyed by the government’s approval of the TransMountain Pipeline and the Trump administration’s plans to put Keystone XL back on the table, are the most bullish about their province’s future economic prospects. Residents of Newfoundland and Labrador, meanwhile, are deeply pessimistic about a turnaround in their region’s fortunes.
Ontario is also feeling notably negative about its provincial economy, a feeling that may reflect both household-level concerns about the high price of electricity in the province and more existential concerns about having the largest outstanding debt of any non-national government in the world, a debt-load that is projected to grow to $350 billion by 2020.
Ontario is certainly not alone on this front. All provinces other than Alberta carried a negative account balance for 2015-16, the last year for which confirmed data is available.
After a quarter in which he saw his approval rating in this survey drop 10 points, the Prime Minister holds steady at 54 per cent approval in this latest sounding:
Trudeau continues to enjoy higher approval ratings than the leaders of the other main federal parties, both of whom are due to be replaced on a permanent basis later this year. Interim Conservative Party of Canada Leader Rona Ambrose has equal approval and disapproval numbers (35% each, with 30% unsure), and Canadians are similarly ambivalent about New Democratic Party Leader Thomas Mulcair (41% approve; 40% disapprove; 18% unsure).
Notably, although Trudeau has the approval of more than half of all Canadians, most of these people say they approve of his performance “somewhat,” (40% overall), not “strongly” (15%).
Regionally, Trudeau’s popularity seems to have leveled off in Ontario, where approval of the PM is up one percentage point this quarter (to 54%) after dropping fully 16 points the quarter before.
In British Columbia, however, approval of Trudeau has continued to drop – a possible consequence of the federal government’s decision to approve liquefied natural gas and pipeline projects in the region. More than half of British Columbians (51%) still approve of the PM’s performance, but that’s down 5 points since December, and 13 points since September, as seen in the following graph:
The Angus Reid Institute (ARI) was founded in October 2014 by pollster and sociologist, Dr. Angus Reid. ARI is a national, not-for-profit, non-partisan public opinion research organization established to advance education by commissioning, conducting and disseminating to the public accessible and impartial statistical data, research and policy analysis on economics, political science, philanthropy, public administration, domestic and international affairs and other socio-economic issues of importance to Canada and its world.
Click here for the full report including tables and methodology
Shachi Kurl, Executive Director: 604.908.1693 firstname.lastname@example.org
Image Credit – Patrick Doyle/Reuters
Source URL: https://angusreid.org/federal-issues-march-2017/
Copyright ©2021 Angus Reid Institute unless otherwise noted.