by Angus Reid | October 24, 2019 9:30 pm
October 25, 2019 – In the hours of ballot counting, as political commentators filled airtime and candidates nervously chewed their nails, a narrative of how one of the closest elections in Canadian history came to be emerged: strategic voting.
Though the struggling Liberals may not have captured the most votes, nor secured enough seats in the House of Commons for a majority, new data confirms they were able to successfully persuade enough voters to help their cause, even begrudgingly, rather than support another party which may have helped to elect the Conservatives.
A post-election survey from the non-profit Angus Reid Institute re-canvassed voters who were still considering their options, even into the late innings of the campaign. Their responses reveal that among those who voted strategically, most chose the party of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.
The study also offers a glimpse of just how volatile the campaign was. Nearly one-quarter of late deciding voters (23%) say although they were leaning towards one party, they changed their minds and cast a ballot for another in the end.
The Angus Reid Institute (ARI) was founded in October 2014 by pollster and sociologist, Dr. Angus Reid. ARI is a national, not-for-profit, non-partisan public opinion research foundation established to advance education by commissioning, conducting and disseminating to the public accessible and impartial statistical data, research and policy analysis on economics, political science, philanthropy, public administration, domestic and international affairs and other socio-economic issues of importance to Canada and its world.
Throughout the election campaign, the Angus Reid Institute asked potential voters to reflect on the certainty of their vote. There were four options that a respondent could choose to describe their current vote intention:
As we noted, even late in the campaign, half of voters had not yet made up their minds, falling into one of the latter three categories based on that question. In order to generate a window into these voters’ motivations and decisions, ARI researchers went back to these late-deciding voters with a follow-up survey.
Once the polls had closed, respondents who had answered that they were less than absolutely certain during the final three weeks of the campaign received a survey asking them a number of questions about which party they supported, why and when they made their decision. Note that this survey is not designed to simulate the election outcome with complete accuracy, but to understand the personal calculations at play among these less-than-certain voters in the final days and weeks of the campaign.
The federal election increasingly appeared as though it would be close in the final days of polling, and ultimately, it was. The Conservative Party edged out the Liberals in the overall vote, 34 per cent to 33 per cent, while the Liberals won more seats, forming a minority government.
Among the nearly 1,600 voters canvassed in this survey, only two-in-five (38%) say they had made their mind up by the middle of the campaign. The rest were still weighing their options in the waning days. In fact, one-quarter of late deciding voters say they made their mind up on voting day:
Just over half (56%) of late deciding voters say that they stayed with their first choice for the entire campaign with little wavering, even though they were unable to say during that time that they were “locked in”. For two-in-five (44%) their decision was far less settled.
Overall, one-quarter of late deciding voters say they ultimately changed their mind from their first choice at some point in the campaign:
NDP supporters were the least likely to have decided early on that they would vote for that party. Indeed, only half (48%) say they were leaning that way all along. Three-in-ten who supported the party say they were initially intending on supporting another.
Conservative and Liberal voters are almost identical to each other in terms of their decision making, with two-thirds leaning toward that party the whole time, and one-third either undecided or having switched from their first choice:
One of the political undercurrents of the campaign was the potential for strategic voting. A considerable number of ridings across the country were expected to be extremely close, which, it was suggested, could lead to vote switching as voters tried to block a party rather than support their first choice. When asked for their primary motivation for their vote, one-quarter said that the strategic element of blocking a party they disliked was a part of their decision. This was, however, a consideration for far more Liberals (45%) than any other group of party supporters.
Those who ultimately settled on the NDP and Green Party were most likely to say that the policies of those parties and the personal representation they felt they would get were their top reasons.
Looking at this another way, half of late deciding voters say that they voted for their party’s candidate because they really liked the party and what it stands for, whereas the other half say that they simply disliked the other options more. Conservatives and Liberals were considerably more likely to say that they were simply less enamoured with other choices, rather than enthusiastic about their own:
For detailed results by age, gender, region, education, and other demographics, click here.
To read the full report, including detailed tables and methodology, click here.
Click here to read the full questionnaire used in this report.
Shachi Kurl, Executive Director: 604.908.1693 firstname.lastname@example.org @shachikurl
Dave Korzinski, Research Director: 250.899.0821 email@example.com
Source URL: https://angusreid.org/election-2019-exit-poll/
Copyright ©2023 Angus Reid Institute unless otherwise noted.