by David Korzinski | September 7, 2023 11:00 pm
September 8, 2023 – As Ontario’s government prepares to further review the Greenbelt, including the lands at the centre of the ongoing controversy, Premier Doug Ford’s personal approval continues to sink.
New data from the non-profit Angus Reid Institute finds that amid ongoing criticism, fewer than three-in-ten (28%) approve of Ford. Two-thirds (67%) of constituents, including one-in-three (36%) who voted for his party just last year, hold negative opinions of the Progressive Conservative Party of Ontario leader.
Much of this criticism is propelled by a widespread sense that land swaps in the Greenbelt were done iniquitously, offering preferential treatment to certain developers, rather than utilizing fair process. Ford, himself, has resisted[1] much of this characterisation, but accepted that better process is needed, stating this week that his government will re-evaluate[2] the land swaps themselves, and review how it handles these deals going forward.
While Ontarians await the results of this, Ford’s rivals are attempting to capitalize and break through in the province, something both the Ontario Liberals and Ontario New Democrats have been unable to do over the past five years.
Among new Liberal leadership candidates, only Bonnie Crombie is recognizable to more than 30 per cent of those who say they would consider the Liberals in a future provincial election.
With the Liberal Party in flux, and the Ontario NDP failing thus far to resonate with many voters under opposition leader Marit Stiles, Ford’s Progressive Conservatives appear to be weathering the proverbial storm. Indeed, two-in-five (38%) Ontario residents say they would vote for the PCPO if an election were held, a ten-point lead over the opposition NDP (28%) and a 16-point advantage over the Liberals (22%).
About ARI
The Angus Reid Institute (ARI) was founded in October 2014 by pollster and sociologist, Dr. Angus Reid. ARI is a national, not-for-profit, non-partisan public opinion research foundation established to advance education by commissioning, conducting and disseminating to the public accessible and impartial statistical data, research and policy analysis on economics, political science, philanthropy, public administration, domestic and international affairs and other socio-economic issues of importance to Canada and its world.
The Greenbelt scandal in Ontario is far from settled, despite a pair of resignations from the housing ministry, including Housing Minister Steve Clark. To recap: the government announced[3] last year in November it would remove 7,400 acres from the Greenbelt, an area of protected farmland and environmentally-sensitive areas around Toronto. The government did this to allow developers to build additional homes to help address the province’s housing crisis but said it would replace the land lost elsewhere along the Greenbelt. Shortly after the announcement, CBC reported[4] prominent developers would stand to benefit from the removals, including developers who purchased land just months before[5] they became unprotected.
Fast forward to this year. A report[6] by Ontario’s auditor general found that certain developers with connections to the housing ministry received preferential treatment in the process to open up development in the Greenbelt. Those developers could see the value of the land they own increased by $8.3 billion[7], according to the AG’s report. Shortly after, a report[8] released by the province’s integrity commissioner described the Greenbelt land swap as a “rushed and flawed process” with a “lack of oversight.” The integrity commissioner’s report heavily criticized Clark and his role in the process.
Ford has denied[9] his government gave “preferential treatment” to developers in the Greenbelt land swap, while deflecting questions[10] about his own role in the decisions. The premier said development would go ahead, but that the government would “re-evaluate”[11] all Greenbelt lands and development applications.
Three-quarters (76%) of Ontarians say they’ve had discussions about the Greenbelt saga with friends and family. Few (7%) say they haven’t heard anything about the scandal:
*Smaller sample size, interpret with caution
Those who believe the Greenbelt should be opened for development are in the minority. One-in-five (22%) believe Ontario needs to look at everything to help addressing the housing affordability crisis, including developing in the Greenbelt. Two-in-five (44%) of those who voted for Ford and PCs in the 2022 election hold this view.
However, more past PC voters (52%), in fact a slight majority, believe the Greenbelt shouldn’t be open to any development. They join nearly all NDP (91%) and Liberal (89%) supporters who say this:
Even prior to the reports by the AG and integrity commissioner, Ford and his government denied they tipped off developers[12] of the pending land swaps. “No one had preferential treatment,” Ford insisted days after the auditor general report[13].
Ontarians are much more inclined to believe the findings of the AG’s report[14] than Ford. Three-quarters (72%), including a majority of past PC voters (57%), believe certain developers received “preferential treatment” from the government in the Greenbelt affair:
The Greenbelt scandal has dragged approval of Ford to its lowest level since he was first elected at the head of a majority government in 2018. Fewer than three-in-ten (28%) of Ontarians approve of their premier:
Ford has enjoyed consistently high approval from past PC voters over the past 18 months. However, recent developments in the Greenbelt issue appear to have soured a significant segment of his own base:
As noted above, Clark resigned as housing minister over the Labour Day long weekend[15]. Prior to that resignation, the Angus Reid Institute canvassed Ontarians on whether they felt Clark, Ford, both or neither should resign in the wake of the Greenbelt controversy.
One-quarter (25%) of past PC voters believe Ford should resign over the controversy, but more (30%) believe no one should have to step down over the Greenbelt land swap:
Ontario’s opposition parties have hammered[16] the PC government over the Greenbelt, calling for more accountability and investigations into the land swap process. However, the increased media exposure and attention on the Greenbelt saga have not resulted in significant gains in recognition for opposition and NDP leader Marit Stiles or the candidates in the Liberal leadership race. Two-in-five (43%) Ontarians say they don’t have an opinion of Stiles, including 37 per cent of those who voted NDP in 2022 (see detailed tables).[17]
Meanwhile, the Ontario Liberal Party is amid a leadership race to replace Steven Del Duca, who resigned after a dismal performance in the 2022 election. Former Liberal MP and current mayor of Mississauga Bonnie Crombie is the most recognized candidate among Ontarians who would consider voting Liberal in an upcoming election. Two-thirds (63%) say they’ve heard of Crombie. The other candidates – Nathaniel Erskine-Smith, Ted Hsu, Yasir Naqvi, and Adil Shamji – are unknown to more than seven-in-ten potential Liberal voters (see detailed tables[18]).
This recognition has apparently given Crombie an early advantage in the race. Three-in-ten (31%) potential Liberal voters say the Mississauga mayor is the most appealing candidate for party leadership. Crombie is also the preferred candidate of 38 per cent past Liberal voters (see detailed tables[18]). Voting starts at the end of November with the results announced on Dec. 2.
Despite the intense criticism and political fallout, Ford’s PCPO continue to hold a double-digit lead in vote intention. Two-in-five (38%) Ontarians say they would support his party if an election were held, while half of Ontarians are split between the ONDP (28%) and the Ontario Liberals (22%).
The Conservatives garner significant support from men and those over the age of 55, allowing them to maintain this advantageous position, just over a year after the last provincial election. Young people show an affinity for the NDP, while women are divided in large part between all three of the major provincial parties:
The PC hold an advantage in most regions of the country. The exception to this is in the 416 area code of Toronto, where the NDP are preferred by approaching half (46%):
While the Greenbelt has received most of the attention in recent weeks, the top issues facing Ontario residents – as with the rest of the country – remain centred on personal finances and health care. Two-thirds of Ontarians say the cost of living and inflation are their primary concern, while fully half (54%) choose health care. Housing affordability, cited by the provincial government as the cause for Greenbelt land deals, is chosen by two-in-five (40%):
Perceived handling of these core issues is likely compounding the challenges the PCPO are currently facing. In addition to criticism about the Greenbelt, the Ford government is seen as doing a poor job on these top provincial priorities as well. One-in-ten say the government is doing a good job in dealing with housing affordability (11%), and the cost of living (12%), while one-in-five offer praise of health care management (20%):
The Angus Reid Institute conducted an online survey from Aug. 31 – Sept. 6, 2023 among a representative randomized sample of 799 Ontario adults who are members of Angus[19] Reid Forum. For comparison purposes only, a probability sample of this size would carry a margin of error of +/- 3 percentage points, 19 times out of 20. Discrepancies in or between totals are due to rounding. The survey was self-commissioned and paid for by ARI.
For detailed results by age, gender, region, education, and other demographics, click here[20].
To read the full report, including detailed tables and methodology, click here[21].
To read the questionnaire, click here[22].
Image – Ford Nation/Facebook
MEDIA CONTACT:
Shachi Kurl, President: 604.908.1693 shachi.kurl@angusreid.org[23] @shachikurl
Dave Korzinski, Research Director: 250.899.0821 dave.korzinski@angusreid.org[24]
Source URL: https://angusreid.org/doug-ford-pc-greenbelt-steve-clark-developers/
Copyright ©2023 Angus Reid Institute unless otherwise noted.