by Angus Reid | August 16, 2020 9:30 pm
August 17, 2020 – Canadians enter their sixth month of the COVID-19 pandemic with the lived experience of the spring and summer behind them, and the uncertainty of flu season, fall weather, and back to school looming ahead.
Against this backdrop, messages aimed at reducing community spread of the coronavirus are being followed as scrupulously as ever by some and falling almost entirely on the deaf ears of others.
Analysis of the latest public opinion data from the non-profit Angus Reid Institute places Canadians into three broad categories in a measure of their behaviors and mindset, known as the COVID Compliance Index.
The Infection Fighters follow virus suppression behaviours carefully and comprise nearly half the population (47%). The Inconsistent represent just over one-third of Canadians (36%) and take a more half-in, half-out approach to flattening the curve. The remaining one-in-five (18%) are Cynical Spreaders who have expanded their social circles, don’t physically distance and are ambivalent towards hand washing and mask wearing. This last group also professes a clear dislike for the way public health officials and political leaders have handled the pandemic.
The Angus Reid Institute (ARI) was founded in October 2014 by pollster and sociologist, Dr. Angus Reid. ARI is a national, not-for-profit, non-partisan public opinion research foundation established to advance education by commissioning, conducting and disseminating to the public accessible and impartial statistical data, research and policy analysis on economics, political science, philanthropy, public administration, domestic and international affairs and other socio-economic issues of importance to Canada and its world.
After a start to the summer that showed reduced cases of COVID-19 across most of Canada, new infections are rising again in many places. In British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba, public health officials have urged residents to comply with social distancing and maintain a policy of seeing fewer faces in open, outdoor spaces. A looming return to school for thousands of children across the country, and the soon-to-follow return of flu season has other parts of the country on edge too.
In order to better understand the dynamics of coronavirus prevention among the Canadian population, the Angus Reid Institute created an index based on variables related to day to day life in the time of COVID-19. Respondents were scored on measures such as washing their hands, wearing a mask, avoiding public spaces, socializing with people in a larger bubble, etc. This index yielded three groups: The Infection Fighters, The Inconsistent and The Cynical Spreaders.
For more, see the notes on methodology at the end the report.
As seen in the infographic below, Infection Fighters are regimented about their COVID-19 safety precautions the are more likely to be older than 54 years and far more inclined to see the status quo held or tightened when it comes to public health restrictions.
The Inconsistent are – as their name suggests – defined by their reliability on some infection-control behaviours such as handwashing and physical distancing but less so on staying home and keeping their social circles small.
Cynical Spreaders have been and continue to be the primary concern of public health officials. This group flouts guidelines, socializes with larger groups (including strangers) and shuns mask usage.
For full size image click here.
After suffering some of the worst effects of the COVID-19 outbreak in the country, Ontario residents self-report more adherence to preventative behaviours, and are most likely to fall into the Infection Fighter segment of the population on the COVID-19 Compliance Index. More than half of Ontarians are in this most vigilant group. Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba are home to the highest percentages of Cynical Spreaders, with three-in-ten residents in each province falling into this segment, based on their own self-reported behaviours:
Young people have been driving the rise in COVID-19 cases in most of the country and these data suggest why. Both men and women under the age of 35 are least likely to be following COVID-19 protocols, avoiding travel, and minimizing their social bubbles. Men and women 55 years of age and older are acting most cautiously:
Breaking this down along finer age brackets, the distinction is even more stark. Younger Canadians are four times as likely as those aged 65+ to be ignoring preventative behaviours:
Educational attainment and political preference also delineate the COVID-19 Compliance Index. University educated Canadians are particularly unlikely to be among the Cynical Spreaders. Those who voted for the Liberal or New Democratic Parties in the last federal election are four-times less likely than past Conservative voters to be in this least adherent group:
While Cynical Spreaders acknowledge and praise the efforts of front-line health workers throughout the pandemic, this is as far as it goes. Just half of this group (52%) say their provincial chief public health officer or premier have done a good job, while closer to one-quarter say the same of Canada’s Chief Public Health Officer, Teresa Tam, and the Prime Minister. This stands in contrast to those in the other segments, who say all official actors (including the Prime Minister, by a narrow margin) have done a good job handling this file.
It might stand to reason that the emotional and mental state of Canadians may play a defining role in the extent to which they engage in infection prevention behaviours. This is apparently not the case. As seen in the table below, Infection Fighters, the Inconsistent and Cynical Spreaders are feeling neither significantly more nor less worn out, happy or “normal” than one another.
Cynical Spreaders, however, are notably angrier than other segments, and less grateful than the Infection Spreaders. The Inconsistent parallel the Infection Fighters in their anxiety.
Among Infection Fighters, two-in-five (40%) would like to see greater governing access to public spaces, physical distancing, and mask policies, likely in order to bring the behaviours of others in line with their own. The Inconsistent are most likely to say that the restrictions are currently hitting the right mark and do not need to be changed (59%), while exactly the same number of Cynical Spreaders say the opposite, that restrictions are too strict:
One of the factors that separates Infection Fighters from the other segments is their unyielding commitment to personal hygiene practices and social distancing. Among this group, nearly all have made this a regular part of their life, as seen in the table below:
Divergence truly occurs around three other behaviours: staying away from public spaces, wearing a mask, and keeping up with COVID-19 information from provincial health officials.
While 91 per cent of Infection Fighters are not spending time in public spaces, this drops to 61 per cent among the Inconsistent and just 25 per cent in the Cynical Spreaders. Half (47%) of the latter group say they are rarely avoiding public places, if ever.
The same disparity is noted among mask use. Two-thirds of Cynical Spreaders say they rarely, if ever, use a mask when they are indoors around people they do not live with. For comparison, 94 per cent of Infection Fighters say this is a part of their regular practice:
Guidelines for how many people Canadians should interact with are varied across the country. One message, however, has been offered consistently: fewer is better. The Angus Reid Institute asked respondents specifically about “discretionary or ‘fun’ interactions” rather than the interpersonal contact that comes through essential activities such as work, grocery shopping or medical appointments, in order to gauge the size of Canadian “bubbles” (for more information see detailed tables)
As one might expect, the three groups of the COVID-19 Compliance Index vary widely on this measure. The majority of Infection Fighters (70%) are seeing five or fewer people while half of Cynical Spreaders (53%) are seeing more than 10:
The good news is that the vast majority of all Canadians, regardless of which group they fit in, are seeing mostly friends and family members. One-in-five (20%) Cynical Spreaders, however, are extending their social circles to people they do not know well:
Among those who are seeing people outside of their immediate household, two-thirds (68%) say they are outdoors more often than not. Infection Fighters are most vigilant in ensuring their interactions are outdoors, while the subsequent groups are progressively less careful:
Half of Canadians (48%) have been heeding the calls from their public officials to avoid travel, while half say that they have travelled outside of their city for fun. Few, however, are leaving their province; just eight per cent say this is something they have done:
While a considerable number of Canadians from all three groups say that they have travelled outside of their city, this number is higher among Cynical Spreaders when compared to Infection Fighters:
Note: Percentages of “Yes” responses is an aggregate of those that travelled outside their city, but within their province; outside their province; and both. See detailed tables for more information.
The Angus Reid Institute is able to isolate which behaviours each segment does more often, and which less. There are nine key behaviours measured as part of this index:
These measures show just how careful the Infection Fighters are. All of them are engaged in two or fewer behaviours from the aforementioned list. Among the Inconsistent, one-in-three are being less careful, engaging in three to five COVID-19 spreading behaviours. Among the Cynical Spreaders, all of them, representing one-in-five Canadians across the country, are engaged in at least three spreading behaviours, and many are doing even more than that:
For even greater detail see the graph below. More than half of Canadians (54%) are engaging in zero or one COVID-19 spreading behaviours. Three-quarters of Cynical Spreaders are engaged in five or more of these activities:
The COVID-19 Compliance Index is based on responses to nine questions. Respondents were scored first on five items, based on how often they:
Additionally, respondents were scored on four more questions related to:
For detailed results by age, gender, region, education, and other demographics, click here.
For detailed results by Index Score, click here.
For questionnaire, click here.
To read the full report, including detailed tables and methodology, click here.
Shachi Kurl, Executive Director: 604.908.1693 firstname.lastname@example.org @shachikurl
Dave Korzinski, Research Director: 250.899.0821 email@example.com
Source URL: https://angusreid.org/covid-compliance/
Copyright ©2021 Angus Reid Institute unless otherwise noted.