Nine-in-ten Canadians say ‘no’ to future arms deals with Saudi Arabia; divided over cancelling current one

by Angus Reid | November 5, 2018 7:30 pm

Two-thirds say Canada should continue public criticism of Saudi human rights abuses

November 6, 2018 –  While Canadians express almost total unanimity about prohibiting future sales of weapons and defence equipment to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, the latest public opinion survey from the Angus Reid Institute shows they are evenly divided over the question of what to do about the current, 15-year, $15 billion dollar agreement between this country and the KSA to exchange military goods for cash.

In the wake of the coverup – and later confirmation of Washington Post journalist Jamal Khashoggi’s murder allegedly on the order of senior Saudi officials, nearly half of Canadians (46%) now believe the government should cancel the deal, a 6-point increase in the number saying this last year.

Another 44 per cent of respondents say Canada should honour the deal, but have no further engagement with the Saudi’s in this industry going forward.

Canadians also express support for the Trudeau government’s actions criticizing the Saudi regime for human rights abuses.

After comments from Foreign Affairs Minister Chrystia Freeland led to a diplomatic spat and demands for an apology from the Saudi Royal Family, 32 per cent of Canadians say the government should continue to voice its displeasure when necessary, while the same number say officials should increase their criticism further. Only three per cent of Canadians say the government should hold back on criticism entirely.


More Key Findings:angus reid saudi




After Khashoggi murder, 9-in-10 say no to future arms exports

Canada’s $15 billion agreement to sell light armoured vehicles to Saudi Arabia was negotiated during the previous Conservative government of Prime Minister Stephen Harper, but sign off and decisions about its future have been[1] and now are the responsibility of the Liberal government under Justin Trudeau.

After the murder of Jamal Khashoggi on October 2, Canada’s government has faced renewed criticism over the contract and calls to cancel it[2] as punishment to the Saudi regime. This, after Germany announced it would suspend further arm sales to the nation until more details are given about the journalist’s death. Trudeau commented[3] that the contract signed by the previous Conservative government would be “very difficult” to suspend or break, though he could not offer details because, in his words, “part of the deal” includes “not talking about” the deal.

The desire to cancel future arms sales to Saudi Arabia is near universal in Canadian public opinion – 46 per cent say the government should cancel the deal and prohibit future sales, while 44 per cent say they would prefer to leave the deal in place, but likewise, would prohibit future exports.

Six-in-ten (63%) say they have been paying attention to the Khashoggi news, though it does not appear to have an impact on views. In fact, those most supportive of cancelling the deal are the group who had not even heard of the incident in Istanbul earlier this month.

The number of Canadians voicing the middle option on this question has not changed since 2017. However, a six-point increase is noted for the group who say cancel the deal and prohibit future sales, mirrored by a six-point decline in the group who say the government should change nothing going forward:

To whom should Canada NOT sell military technology?

Canada’s arms exports are regulated by export control policy guidelines[4]. The Angus Reid Institute introduced these guidelines to respondents, as noted below, and then asked them to choose from a list of countries those that they would allow trade with and those they would ban.

The list of countries offered includes the top ten nations in terms of Canada’s arms export value, as well as the two that had permits denied in 2017 – Iran and China.

Three-quarters of Canadians (76%) say that Canada should not sell military defense and technology to Iran or the KSA. China is chosen by fewer, but still a majority of respondents:

The Angus Reid Institute asked about these same countries – with the exception of Iran and China – last year. At the time, the federal government was facing criticism over allegations that the Saudi military had used Canadian light armoured vehicles to quell dissent among their own citizens. Notably, the number of Canadians saying Saudi Arabia should not be on the list of eligible arms export markets has risen substantially:

While Saudi Arabia makes up nearly half of all non-U.S. arms exports from Canada, it would be fair to say that many do not feel comfortable with commerce when it comes to this industry and that country. Canada’s own assessment of Saudi Arabia[5] found a “high number of executions, repression of political opposition, arbitrary arrest, suppression of freedom of expression and discrimination against women.”

Nonetheless, even among those Canadians who say that Canada should not be selling arms to Saudi Arabia, only 53 per cent say they would kill the deal outright based on the latest news. Another 44 per cent say they would leave this deal in place, and prohibit future trade. Concerns about a potential billion dollar price tag[6] that may come with a cancellation of the deal have had many, including the Prime Minister, proceeding with caution when discussing any alterations to the contract.

Interestingly, one-quarter of those who originally said it’s okay to sell arms to Saudi Arabia (23%), later said they would prohibit future deals once considering all information received in the survey. View questionnaire here[7] for order of questions and information offered:

Majority supportive of Canada’s criticism toward Saudi Arabia

Canada’s relations with Saudi Arabia had already made news in 2018, prior to the Khashoggi incident. In August, Foreign Affairs Minister Chrystia Freeland tweeted to call for the release of two Saudi human rights activists.

The Saudi government responded with a severing of diplomatic and trade ties[8] and a demand for an apology from the Canadian leadership. Prime Minister Trudeau said that Canada would not apologize and would “speak out wherever we see the need[9]”.

This path of potential conflict is something that most Canadians support. Indeed, one-in-three (32%) say that the government should continue its current strategy. The same number would prefer that the government become even more vocal in its criticisms of a regime many would rather condemn than respect.

Related: Respect or Condemn? Canadian opinion on various countries[10]

Past Conservative voters are twice as likely as supporters of the Liberals or NDP to say that the government should be more guarded in its criticism, while young men are the most likely to support an escalation of criticism:

The Angus Reid Institute (ARI) was founded in October 2014 by pollster and sociologist, Dr. Angus Reid. ARI is a national, not-for-profit, non-partisan public opinion research foundation established to advance education by commissioning, conducting and disseminating to the public accessible and impartial statistical data, research and policy analysis on economics, political science, philanthropy, public administration, domestic and international affairs and other socio-economic issues of importance to Canada and its world.


For detailed results by age, gender, region, education, and other demographics, click here[11]

Click here for the full report including tables and methodology[12]

Click here for the questionnaire used in this survey[13]


Shachi Kurl, Executive Director: 604.908.1693[14] @shachikurl

Dave Korzinski, Research Associate: 250.899.0821[15]

  1. have been:
  2. calls to cancel it:
  3. Trudeau commented:
  4. export control policy guidelines:
  5. assessment of Saudi Arabia:
  6. billion dollar price tag:
  7. View questionnaire here:
  8. a severing of diplomatic and trade ties:
  9. speak out wherever we see the need:
  10. Related: Respect or Condemn? Canadian opinion on various countries:
  11. click here:
  12. Click here for the full report including tables and methodology:
  13. Click here for the questionnaire used in this survey:

Source URL: