by David Korzinski | December 5, 2018 7:30 pm
December 6, 2018 – The vast majority of Canadians believe transporting goods by sea is safe, and most say marine shipping is growing in importance in this era of heightened trade uncertainty between Canada and the United States.
These are some of the key findings of a new study conducted by the Angus Reid Institute in partnership with the Clear Seas Centre for Responsible Marine Shipping. The new public opinion poll builds on a benchmark study on public attitudes about the shipping industry first conducted in March 2016.
Today, the Canadian public places a higher degree of importance on marine shipping than it did back then. Greater numbers now say the industry is “critically important” to the Canadian economy, Canada’s access to imported goods, and Canada’s ability to access export markets than did so in 2016.
As they were in 2016, however, Canadians remain concerned about the prospect of oil and fuel spills, even as they express confidence that shipping is generally safe and well-regulated.
British Columbians tend to be most worried about the safety of shipping oil and gas in Canadian waters, while Albertans and those in Atlantic Canada – likely reflecting the prominence of petroleum industries in their provinces – are most confident.
When the Angus Reid Institute (ARI) and Clear Seas Centre for Responsible Marine Shipping (Clear Seas) asked Canadians in 2016 whether marine shipping had been growing or shrinking in importance in Canada over the last 15 to 20 years, the response was rather ambivalent. Some four-in-ten (43%) said the industry had been growing more important, while nearly half (47%) said it had been “staying about the same.”
Fast forward two-and-a-half years, and responses to this same question are quite different. A full majority (55%) now say shipping has become more important in Canada over the last two decades, while fewer than one-in-three (31%) now say the industry’s relevance has been staying about the same.
While many other Canadian attitudes toward shipping have remained constant since 2016, this one has changed dramatically.
More than eight-in-ten Canadians say marine shipping is either “critically important” or “very important” to Canada’s ability to export goods to other markets. This represents a slight overall increase since 2016 (when 77% chose one of these two options), but an 11-point increase in the percentage saying shipping is “critically important” to export prospects:
A similar increase in the number of Canadians viewing shipping as “critically important” can be seen in assessments of the industry’s impact on Canada’s access to goods from other countries, communities on the coast, and the Canadian economy as a whole:
Though a strong majority across the country feels shipping is important to coastal communities, interestingly, it is those who aren’t on the coasts who are most likely to say this. In the Prairie provinces of Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba, 85 per cent say shipping is either critically or very important to cities and towns near the ocean, while in Quebec, this drops to a lower but still-majority 69 per cent (see comprehensive tables for greater detail).
Residents of B.C. and Atlantic Canada are among those most likely to say shipping is highly important to the communities they live in, as well as their provincial economies. They are joined in these views – perhaps surprisingly – by Albertans, a full majority of whom see shipping as critically or very important to the communities in which they live.
In a similar vein, Albertans are among those most likely to say shipping is key to their daily lives, outpacing Ontario, B.C., and Quebec residents by multiple percentage points on this question:
As mentioned, the perception that shipping is growing in importance comes alongside consistent findings on more general questions about the industry.
More than eight-in-ten (85%) have either a “very positive” or “somewhat positive” image of shipping, overall, a number statistically unchanged from 2016 (when 86% had positive views).
Negative overall impressions of shipping are highest (though still well short of a majority) in British Columbia and Quebec, rising to one-in-five in each province:
Shipping’s sustained positive image comes alongside fairly consistent views of Canada’s maritime heritage. Roughly half of Canadians (52%) say they identify “strongly” or “a fair amount” with Canada being a sea-faring nation, which represents a slight decrease since 2016 (when 58% felt this way).
That said, most of the shift in maritime identification between the first and second waves of this survey comes in the middle two opinions, with the percentages identifying strongly or not at all staying the same:
As was the case in 2016, those living on the coasts – as well as men and those ages 55 and older – are more likely to identify Canada as a sea-faring nation (see comprehensive tables).
Perhaps underlying these largely positive views of shipping in Canada – and indeed the industry’s perceived importance – is the fact that Canadians continue to overestimate the proportion of their country’s total trade that is conducted by sea.
Asked to estimate what percentage of imported consumer goods arrive in Canada by ship, Canadians, on average, place the total at roughly 67 per cent. They estimate a similar 64 per cent when asked to guess the proportion of all trade – imports and exports – conducted by ship. These estimates are higher than a 2017 estimate that approximately 20 per cent of Canada’s total trade by value is moved by ship.
The vast majority of Canadians (83%) believe that at least half of the products they use on a daily basis were – at some point – transported by ship:
Given Canadians’ largely positive views of marine shipping as an industry, it’s perhaps not surprising that an overwhelming majority of them (94%) say shipping is either “very safe” or “generally safe.”
This total is unchanged since 2016, but the percentage saying shipping is “very safe” has risen by 9 points:
The widespread perception that marine shipping is safe should not be misinterpreted as a belief that the industry carries no risks.
Indeed, asked what concerns they have about the industry, more than half of Canadians cite the potential for oil spills (54%) or fuel spills (51%).
Petroleum-related safety concerns will be discussed in greater detail later in this report. For now, it’s worth noting that this question about potential safety issues was asked about shipping overall, before respondents had been asked to think about the shipping of oil and gas, suggesting that these concerns are top-of-mind for Canadians, even as they rate the industry as safe overall.
Other safety issues Canadians find worrisome are summarized in the graph that follows.
In addition to the potential for spills, many of Canadians’ biggest concerns about shipping safety are related to the natural environment, from threats to marine life (46% mention this as an issue) to water and air pollution (45% and 25%, respectively).
For most Canadians, these environmental risks do not outweigh the economic contributions shipping makes to their country. Respondents were asked to assess these considerations on a scale from 1 to 5, with a 1 meaning that the economic contribution “totally outweighs” the environmental risks, and a 5 meaning the opposite. A response of 3 indicated a belief that there is a “50/50 balance” between the two sides.
While half of Canadians (49%) locate themselves in the middle of this scale, considerably more place themselves on the economic contribution side than on the environmental risk side, as seen in the following graph:
The perspective that shipping’s economic contribution to Canada outweighs any environmental risks associated with it has remained fairly consistent at the topline level since 2016, when 31 per cent leaned toward the economic side of the scale and 14 per cent toward the environmental side, with 55 per cent in the centre.
The proportion of Canadians saying environmental risks outweigh economic contributions has risen slightly, driven in large part by Quebec residents, who – in 2018 – are more likely to choose the environment side of this equation than the economy side:
Precisely why Quebec residents appear to have grown more concerned about environmental risks is unclear. No other region’s respondents changed their overall orientation toward this question from 2016 to 2018.
Asked to use the same scale in assessing the environmental risk and economic reward of a number of other industries, including road transportation, rail transportation, electrical utilities, and the oil industry, Canadians vary in their responses, as seen in the graph that follows.
Canadians are more likely to view rail and electrical utilities as economic contributors than environmental risks, but tend to fall on the environmental side of the equation when asked about the oil industry (39% do, compared to 28% who say economic contributions outweigh environmental risk, and 34% who say the trade-off is about even).
Alberta is a significant exception to this line of thinking, with 57 per cent of respondents believing that the economic contribution outweighs the environmental risks. (Note that the questionnaire asked about trucking and rail transportation in general terms and did not specifically ask about shipping oil via these methods.)
Views of the trucking, railway, and electrical utilities industries vary less by region than views of marine shipping and the oil industry do (see comprehensive tables).
Despite the overall view that the environmental risks outweigh the economic benefits of the oil industry, a majority of Canadians are confident that shipping petroleum products in Canadian waters is safe. Six-in-ten (61%) say they are either “very” (18%) or “somewhat confident” (43%) about this, with the overall total essentially unchanged since 2016.
Alberta (80%) and Atlantic Canada (71%) – which sees approximately 85 per cent of all oil tanker movements in Canadian waters – are the most confident on the safety of shipping oil and gas, while B.C. is almost evenly split between confidence and concern:
When asked directly whether they support or oppose an increase in oil tanker traffic in and around the province’s South Coast, most British Columbians (57%) express opposition. They are joined in this view by 51 per cent of Quebecers – the only other regional group where opposition to increased tanker traffic in Southern B.C. tops 50 per cent:
This finding is notable in light of past ARI polling, which has consistently shown British Columbians as more inclined to support than oppose the Trans Mountain Pipeline expansion project that would be responsible for an increase in tanker traffic in the South Coast of BC.
Also interesting is the fact that B.C. residents are more open to allowing crude oil shipments along their province’s North Coast than residents of any other region except Alberta. Everywhere else, at least a small majority supports such a prohibition, which was a part of the Liberals’ election platform in 2015 and recently moved from the House of Commons to the Senate for additional legislative review:
The gulf between B.C. and Quebec – often the two provinces most aligned in their opposition to expansion of the resource industry and most supportive of environmental initiatives – on this question is replicated on another one: the shipping of liquefied natural gas (LNG) in Canadian waters.
LNG has been shipped in the waters around Atlantic Canada for many years. Overall, six-in-ten Canadians (62%) support the shipping of LNG, including at least this many in every region except Quebec, where 54 per cent are opposed:
Each of the petroleum-related shipping proposals canvassed in this survey has grown at least slightly in support since 2016. This includes both support for increased shipping in various locations, as well as support for moratoriums on shipping in others, as seen in the graph that follows.
In addition to the regional divides previously discussed, there is a pronounced gender gap on these questions. Men are much more supportive of expanded petroleum shipping than women, who are, in turn, more supportive of the two prohibitions on shipping petroleum products asked about in the survey.
This gender divide existed in 2016 results, but it has become more pronounced in 2018, especially on the moratorium questions, where women are at least 12 percentage points more likely than men to express support (compared to gaps of 4 and 7 points respectively in 2016).
Paradoxically, despite continued confidence in – and increasing support for – shipping oil in Canadian waters, the Canadian public continues to overestimate the number of major spills that have occurred in this country in the last 10 years.
As was the case during the first wave of this survey, respondents were provided with the International Tanker Owners Pollution Federation (ITOPF) definition of a “major spill” – one in which 700 tonnes of petroleum or more are spilled (roughly equivalent to 1/3 of the volume of an Olympic swimming pool). While several smaller spills and fuel leaks have occurred in the last decade, none of them have been large enough to be considered major.
Just one-in-ten respondents (11%) correctly identify this total, while the vast majority of Canadians believe that at least one major spill has occurred in the last 10 years. Indeed, two-thirds of Canadians (68%) believe that there have been three or more such spills in that time.
In keeping with the theme of positive assessments of shipping safety – both generally and for petroleum products – most Canadians also express confidence in the rules and regulations governing marine shipping in their country.
Three-quarters of Canadians (75%) say they are either “very” or “fairly confident” in such rules, though most respondents locate themselves in the latter category, as seen in the following graph:
Majorities are confident in every region of the country, and they top seven-in-ten everywhere but British Columbia, where 62 per cent are at least fairly confident in shipping regulations:
This confidence in marine shipping regulations appears to extend to the regulatory bodies tasked with crafting and maintaining them as well.
Asked about a variety of agencies responsible for marine safety, more than half of Canadians say each one is doing a “good job.” The federal government overall receives the most criticism, with one-third (33%) of Canadians saying they are doing a bad job when it comes to shipping regulation, but paradoxically, 67 per cent of Canadians say that specific federal departments and agencies are doing a good job and only 18 per cent say they are doing a bad job:
The percentage of Canadians saying each of these organizations is doing a good job has increased since 2016, with the largest increases for the shipping industry (up 16 percentage points) and Canada’s port and harbour authorities (+12). As was the case in 2016, men and older respondents are more likely to give a positive assessment to each of the agencies canvassed (see comprehensive tables).
Also increased considerably since the previous wave of this survey is the perception that two specific regulations – the requirement that ships operating in Canada have licensed marine pilots with local knowledge to guide them in and out of port, and the requirement that they have a contract with a certified response organization in case of an oil or fuel spill (with the polluter paying the clean-up costs) – increase safety in Canadian waters overall. Note that the descriptions of these two requirements were changed slightly in the 2018 questionnaire, in order to improve clarity (read the 2018 questionnaire here and the 2016 questionnaire here).
Today, six-in-ten (60%) say response organization rules make shipping in Canada safer (up from 44% in 2016), and nearly three-in-four (74%) say the same about marine pilotage rules (up from 63%):
Of course, most Canadians are not particularly familiar with the specifics of laws that govern the shipping industry in their country, which is why the questionnaire used in this survey sought to explain policies such as the ones in the preceding graph. (Read the full text of the questionnaire here.)
Along these lines, fully six-in-ten Canadians (60%) say they are unfamiliar with the federal government’s Oceans Protection Plan – an umbrella program intended to protect the nation’s coasts and waterways while growing the economy. Only one-in-seven Canadians (14%) are certain that they have heard of the program.
Once the plan is explained to them, however, Canadians tend to feel positively about it, as they do about shipping regulation in general. Almost three-quarters (73%) say they are either “very” or “fairly confident” in the Oceans Protection Plan, with a full majority (57%) locating themselves among the “fairly confident.”
Interestingly, confidence is lowest in British Columbia, but highest in Quebec, making views of the plan another point of divergence between the two often-aligned provinces.
Despite their generally high opinion of marine shipping safety and the associated regulations, Canadians see further room for improvement.
Asked whether government pays an appropriate amount of attention to this issue – both in terms of the policies and procedures it puts in place, and its oversight and enforcement of such rules – half of Canadians say no, and those who say this overwhelmingly believe too little attention is paid:
British Columbians and Quebecers lead the way in perceiving too little attention on these areas from government. Alberta, meanwhile, is the only region in which those who say government pays an appropriate amount of attention to marine shipping concerns outnumber those who say it does not.
While this pattern holds true on both questions, it is more pronounced on views of oversight and enforcement, which are shown in the graph that follows. (See comprehensive tables for greater detail.)
Perhaps unsurprisingly, the one-in-four Canadians who lack confidence in the overall regulatory framework for marine shipping are also overwhelmingly of the opinion that not enough attention is being given to this issue.
More than seven-in-ten (72%) in this group say this, while those who express confidence in safety regulations are more divided on the need for additional government attention:
The results demonstrate a gender gap on the question of oversight. Men of all ages are more confident in an appropriate amount of government oversight than women of all ages (38% compared to 22%). Women are more likely to respond “not enough attention” (48% versus 41% for men) or “really can’t say” (25% versus 16% for men). However, very few of either gender (5%) indicate that there is “too much attention” paid to policies and procedures for safe marine shipping.
The Angus Reid Institute (ARI) was founded in October 2014 by pollster and sociologist, Dr. Angus Reid. ARI is a national, not-for-profit, non-partisan public opinion research foundation established to advance education by commissioning, conducting and disseminating to the public accessible and impartial statistical data, research and policy analysis on economics, political science, philanthropy, public administration, domestic and international affairs and other socio-economic issues of importance to Canada and its world.
Clear Seas Centre for Responsible Marine Shipping is an independent, not-for-profit organization that provides impartial and evidence-based research to inform the public and policy makers about marine shipping in Canada, including risks, mitigation measures and best practices for safe and sustainable marine shipping. Clear Seas’ vision for safe and sustainable shipping is holistic, encompassing environmental, social and economic impacts of the shipping industry. Clear Seas was officially launched in 2015 to be a leading source of independent, fact-based information on safe and sustainable marine shipping in Canada.
For detailed results by age, gender, region, education, and other demographics, click here.
Click here for the full report including tables and methodology
Pour la version française, cliquez ici
Click here for the questionnaire used in this survey
Shachi Kurl, Executive Director, Angus Reid Institute: 604.908.1693 email@example.com @shachikurl
Peter Ellis, Executive Director, Clear Seas: 604.408.1648 firstname.lastname@example.org @ClearSeasOrg
IMAGE CREDIT: LNG Canada
Source URL: http://angusreid.org/marine-shipping-clear-seas/
Copyright ©2019 Angus Reid Institute unless otherwise noted.