Cabinet construct: Canadians lean towards gender parity among ministers as a goal, not the standard

by Angus Reid | January 17, 2019 7:30 pm

Regional balance viewed as more important than gender balance, diversity


January 18, 2018 – The latest round of cabinet shuffling this week offered a window into the Liberal government’s strategy when it comes to creating what it believes is the most politically appealing mix of ministers.

With the departure of Nova Scotia minister Scott Brison, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau was tasked with promoting MPs who reflect not just the gender balance that has defined his term, but also the regional balance previous governments have sought to get right.

But how important are such considerations – and machinations – in the minds of Canadians?

A new Angus Reid Institute survey finds a plurality (45%) say gender parity should be a goal for government when composing a cabinet, though they’re less inclined to believe it should be a top priority. The rest are evenly divided between viewing gender parity as the standard for future governments (27%) and not a consideration at all (28%).

Additionally, while the plurality view a gender balanced cabinet as having has a positive impact on government (45%), one-in-five disagree (21%), while a third say it has had no impact either way.

More Key Findings:

 

INDEX:

 

Is Gender balance a benefit?

Notwithstanding some observers left perplexed[1] this week by the decision to move Jody Wilson-Raybould from the Ministry of Justice to Veterans Affairs, the government shakeup was arguably relatively minor, with the most public faces[2] remaining in their current positions. The government has largely maintained its core roster and its principle of gender balance in cabinet; one that was met with praise from some[3] and criticism from others[4] when it was announced in 2015.

For their part, Canadians lack consensus when reflecting upon the last three years and the impact that gender parity might have made in federal politics. The largest group, 45 per cent, say they believe this composition has had a positive impact – more than twice as many who say it has been a detriment overall (21%). However, a significant number, one-in-three (34%) also say that they don’t believe there has been an impact either way:

 

 

Given the nature of this question, it is perhaps unsurprising that there is a gendered element to public opinion in responses. Young women (those between the ages of 18 and 34) are overwhelmingly positive, with two-thirds (68%) saying that this has been a benefit for the functioning of the government. A majority of women age 35 to 54 also say this, while women 55 and older and young men mirror the national total.

Men over the age of 35, however, are much more likely to say that gender balance has had a negative impact:

Overall, men are twice as likely as women to say that the Liberal government’s gender parity commitment has had a negative impact. Conservatives, meanwhile, are substantially more critical than supporters of the other two major federal parties:

Should it be the standard?

While Canadians are more positive than negative about the impact gender-balance in cabinet has had, they are divided about what future governments should commit to.

One-quarter (27%) say that gender balance in cabinet should be the standard, but almost half say it should be more of a goal and less of an obligation (45%). Another 28 per cent would prefer that gender not be a consideration at all in forming government.

Men and women are close to equally likely to choose the middle option on this question – their disagreement is on the margins.

Again, those who supported the federal Conservatives in 2015 are substantially more likely than supporters of the other major federal parties to say that gender balance should be given no consideration at all:

Notably, half of those who view the Trudeau government’s approach on gender balance as positive say that it should additionally be the standard (51%), but another 46 per cent would prefer that it be merely a goal of any incoming government, rather than a codified norm:

Regional representation

One of the more accepted traditions in building a federal cabinet is regional representation. When Prime Ministers are filling out the top positions in the government, it is common that they will try to ensure that each region of the country is represented.

This idea is much less controversial for Canadians than gender balance. Indeed, twice as many say that this should continue to be the standard as say the same of balancing men and women (52% versus 27%). Another four-in-ten (41%) say that this should be a goal of the government, if not a top priority.

Saskatchewan, Alberta and Atlantic Canadian residents are most likely to say this should be the standard:

 

 

More division about diversity

Alongside seeking gender balance, the Trudeau government has made a concerted effort to create “a government as diverse as Canada[5]”. This process has extended beyond the federal cabinet, to more than 1,500 lower-level government appointments.

At the federal level, Canadians are less concerned with diversity than they are regional representation. Equal numbers say diversity should be the standard (28%) and that it should not be a consideration at all (27%) while a much larger group (45%) say it should be a goal but not a top priority.

Women are more likely than men to value diversity, with twice as many saying it should be the standard (36% to 19%). Past CPC supporters, meanwhile, are four-times as likely as the current government’s supporters to say that diversity should be given no consideration:

The idea that the government should make diversity in cabinet a goal or a standard is held by at least six-in-ten residents in every region. Those most opposed are found in Saskatchewan (40%) and Alberta (30%):

 

The Angus Reid Institute (ARI) was founded in October 2014 by pollster and sociologist, Dr. Angus Reid. ARI is a national, not-for-profit, non-partisan public opinion research foundation established to advance education by commissioning, conducting and disseminating to the public accessible and impartial statistical data, research and policy analysis on economics, political science, philanthropy, public administration, domestic and international affairs and other socio-economic issues of importance to Canada and its world.

For detailed results by age, gender, region, education, and other demographics, click here[6].

Click here for the full report including tables and methodology[7]

Click here for the questionnaire used in this survey[8]

 

MEDIA CONTACTS:

Shachi Kurl, Executive Director, Angus Reid Institute: 604.908.1693 shachi.kurl@angusreid.org[9] @shachikurl

Dave Korzinski, Research Associate: 250.899.0821 dave.korzinski@angusreid.org[10]

Endnotes:
  1. left perplexed: https://nationalpost.com/opinion/john-ivison-wilson-raybould-couldnt-hide-her-disappointment-at-move-from-justice-minister
  2. most public faces: http://angusreid.org/cabinet-performance-2018/
  3. praise from some: https://www.macleans.ca/politics/ottawa/cabinet-picks-made-for-plenty-of-reasons-aside-from-merit/
  4. criticism from others: https://calgaryherald.com/opinion/editorials/editorial-choose-cabinet-by-merit
  5. a government as diverse as Canada: https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/trudeau-appointments-diversity-analysis-wherry-1.4448740
  6. click here: http://angusreid.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/2018.01.15_gender_cabinet_release.pdf
  7. Click here for the full report including tables and methodology: http://angusreid.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/2018.12.12_GenderBalanceCabinet-Release.pdf
  8. Click here for the questionnaire used in this survey: http://angusreid.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/2018.12.13_Cabinet_Release-questionnaire.pdf
  9. shachi.kurl@angusreid.org: mailto:shachi.kurl@angusreid.org
  10. dave.korzinski@angusreid.org: mailto:dave.korzinski@angusreid.org

Source URL: http://angusreid.org/gender-balanced-cabinet/