by David Korzinski | December 3, 2019 9:30 pm
December 4, 2019 – While the majority of adults in this country profess some belief in God or a higher power, a significant segment also wishes to see a more secular nation.
A new study from the Angus Reid Institute, in partnership with non-partisan, faith-based organization Cardus, explores elements of this push-and-pull, finding that a premium placed on freedom of religion exists alongside limitations as to how far that faith should extend in public life.
For example, while Canadians are nearly five times as likely to say that freedom of religion makes Canada a better country (62%) than a worse one (12%), they remain divided over whether the values offered by faith contribute to improving equality and human rights (42% disagree that they do). Further, while a firm majority (58%) say that a faith-based upbringing creates better citizenship characteristics, four-in-ten (42%) disagree.
Much of this division is based not on demographics like age, gender, or political persuasion, but on a mindset not immediately evident based on traditional categorizations. The Angus Reid Institute used 17 different variables to categorize Canadians across a Public Faith Index to create three groups: The Public Faith Proponents, the Uncertain and the Public Faith Opponents. Each holds a distinct mindset regarding what role faith should play in public life, and each is comprised of a diverse group of Canadians from all ages, genders and political backgrounds.
This study explores questions about the role of faith in public life as we enter the next decade, using these public faith mindsets as a guide.
More Key Findings:
The Angus Reid Institute (ARI) was founded in October 2014 by pollster and sociologist, Dr. Angus Reid. ARI is a national, not-for-profit, non-partisan public opinion research foundation established to advance education by commissioning, conducting and disseminating to the public accessible and impartial statistical data, research and policy analysis on economics, political science, philanthropy, public administration, domestic and international affairs and other socio-economic issues of importance to Canada and its world.
One item in the Angus Reid Institute’s tracking data that is consistent over the past few years is the sentiment that freedom of religion makes Canada a better country. Asked again this year, 62 per cent of Canadians say that this is the case, as opposed to just 12 per cent who say that this freedom actually makes Canada worse off. This represents the largest gap between these two responses in the three years of tracking:
Canadians across the country are in at least majority agreement that freedom of religion is a worthy pursuit for the country. That said, in Alberta and Quebec there are higher levels of ambivalence and lower levels of positivity:
The clearest dividing line on this question, however, is not regional. While there are generational differences (see detailed tables here), the widest disparity is found using the Angus Reid Institute’s Public Faith Index.
This ‘additive index’ was created in order to categorize Canadian views on the role and value of faith in public life. Respondents were asked 17 questions across three broad themes regarding their view of faith and its place in Canadian society.
Canadians fall into three categories broadly based on the Index. Just under four-in-ten (36%) are classified as “Public Faith Proponents”. Members of this group hold a supportive posture when it comes to increasing the public’s knowledge of faith and religion and recognizing their importance to society. Another group of the same size, the “Public Faith Opponents” (32%) feel the opposite. This group generally feels religion should have a reduced role in politics and government. Another three-in-ten (30%) take the middle position in this debate, with a more mixed view, and are labeled as “the Uncertain”.
For more on the Public Faith Index, click here.
Note that the Index proportions are largely unchanged from last year.
Using this categorization for analysis, it is clear that those who see less historical contribution to the country by faith groups, and who would like to see faith have less of a role in government and public life, are far more likely to say that freedom of religion has a negative impact on society. These Public Faith Opponents are less than half as likely to be positive about the impact of freedom of religion than Public Faith Proponents:
While one might assume that certain political ideologies would fit into certain classifications, this does not appear to be the case. Each portion of the Index is made up of a relatively diverse political group, although past Bloc voters do represent an outlier, as seen in the graph below:
Further, the Public Faith Index is comprised of people from all age and gender combinations. While older men show a slight inclination toward being Opponents, and younger women conversely, toward being Proponents, each Index group is well represented among each of these societal segments. Thus, this Index is useful in understanding the mindsets in Canadian society that may not be necessarily defined by simple demographic analysis.
When it comes to the diversity of mindsets in Canada regarding the role of faith in public life, there is perhaps no better exemplification than looking at the Index by religious affiliation. Each faith group is well represented across the Index, though Evangelical Protestants are least likely to Oppose faith in the public square and non-religious Canadians are most likely:
Over the last three years, the Angus Reid Institute has consistently found that around one-in-four Canadians feel that their personal faith and values are shut out from Canadian society. The largest group in each year said that they don’t feel either accepted or rejected, while one-in-three say that society makes room for their faith:
Feelings of inclusion or exclusion are varied across different religious groups. Evangelical Protestants feel the most shut out, while the smallest religious groups collectively feel the most accepted:
Responses are considerably more positive overall when Canadians assess whether they feel the federal government respects their religious tradition. One-in-five remain critical of the reception they receive, but 78 per cent say they feel respected:
One ongoing debate in Canadian society is the appropriateness of religious symbols in public life. This conversation has been particularly relevant in Quebec after the passage of Bill-21, which bans public employees from wearing religious symbols. Asked whether they feel comfortable with people wearing religious garments and symbols in the workplace, six-in-ten Canadians overall (62%), and at least 63 per cent in every region other than Quebec, say that they do. Four-in-ten (38%) disagree, led by just over half of residents in Quebec (54%):
Opinions over this issue diverge widely across the Public Faith Index. Four-in-five Public Faith Proponents (78%) feel comfortable seeing religious attire in the workplace, as do most of the Uncertain (65%). Opponents however, lean the other way:
If, indeed, some religious Canadians are feeling shut out by society, it is likely at least partially attributable to Canada’s more recently codified tradition of secularism. While the Charter of Rights and Freedoms entrenched religious freedom in Canada when it was established in 1982, it also represented an official recognition of multiculturalism, which would require a secular foundation in order to address diverse groups in Canada.
These parallel realities help to explain the division in Canadian society over the potential of faith communities to inform Canadian values. Asked whether they felt religious and faith communities strengthen Canadian values, a slight majority (57%) agree but a considerable minority (43%) do not believe this is the case.
Notably, Public Faith Opponents are far more likely to say that they do not believe faith communities have a role to play here, while Proponents overwhelmingly feel that they do:
Uncertainty continues to define Canadian views when considering more tangible public contributions. Just as with the question of values, Canadians hold varying perspectives on what role faith communities play. For the last three years, approximately one-in-three Canadians have said that they believe these groups make a positive contribution to Canada. Meanwhile, half continue to say that they believe the impact is a mix of both good and bad:
Faith communities may have a mixed contribution to Canadian society in the minds of many, but a firm majority believe that the values that a religious upbringing offers can help to create good citizens. Six-in-ten (58%), led by men and women 55 years of age and older, say that they feel faith-focused childhood is beneficial, while four-in-ten disagree (42%):
The primary point of division, again, appears to be whether or not one sees a role for faith in the public square. Those who lean that way, Public Faith Proponents, are near-unanimous that the characteristics offered by religion are valuable, while three-quarters of Public Faith Opponents (74%) disagree:
The divide over values extends to the more existential question of life’s purpose. Canadians were asked to select one of the following statements to represent “the best way to live life”: “Achieving one’s own happiness and dreams” or “being more concerned about helping others.” Close to an equal number choose each option. That said, those who are more opposed to faith in public life tend to look inwards on this question, toward their own satisfaction, while Public Faith Proponents, though divided, lean slightly toward focusing on others:
There are different levels of enthusiasm for different religious groups in Canada, which help to explain elements of the disagreements over the value of faith. Consider, for example, Canadian opinions of Catholicism. Close to three-in-ten (28%) feel the presence of Catholics in Canada benefits the country as a whole, while nearly the same number (24%) say that Canada is worse off because of Catholicism’s influence.
Looking at this as a net score, that is, the number of Canadians saying a faith group benefits minus damages Canadian society, Protestantism and Judaism score most highly, while Evangelical Christianity and Islam score most poorly:
Views of different faiths through the Spectrum of Spirituality
Another important measure of religiosity in Canadian society is not based on the role of faith in public life, so much as it is based on one’s own personal commitment to faith. The Angus Reid Institute created the Spectrum of Spirituality in 2017 (read more here) based on responses to a series of questions about personal belief and faith practice. Briefly:
What is notable in 2019 is the slight movement downward among those who are Religiously Committed and coincident upward bump for those who are Spiritually Uncertain. While one data point does not necessarily portend a trend, it is worth noting as faith evolves in Canada:
The Spectrum of Spirituality is a relevant tool in order to further understand which faiths are viewed as either benefiting or damaging Canadian society. Those who are Religiously Committed are the most respectful and appreciative of other religious groups, offering a net positive score in most cases, though they offer a net negative score for Sikhism (-1) and Islam (-23). They are also particularly negative about Atheism (-39).
As religiosity declines, appreciation for other groups correspondingly declines to the point where Non-Believers feel that no other group is of net benefit to society other than Atheists.
Image Credit – Flickr/Ben McLeod
For detailed results by age, gender, region, education, and other demographics, click here.
For detailed results by religious identity, click here.
To read the full report, including detailed tables and methodology, click here.
Click here to read the full questionnaire used in this report.
Shachi Kurl, Executive Director: 604.908.1693 firstname.lastname@example.org @shachikurl
Dave Korzinski, Research Director: 250.899.0821 email@example.com
Source URL: http://angusreid.org/freedom-of-religion/
Copyright ©2020 Angus Reid Institute unless otherwise noted.