by Angus Reid | December 16, 2019 4:30 pm
Dec 17, 2019 – Andrew Scheer’s resignation as Conservative leader earlier this month may have closed the book on what – compared to expectations – was a disappointing chapter in the history of the CPC. A fresh narrative has yet to be written, but just what story will be told and who will tell it remains to be seen.
The latest study from the non-profit Angus Reid Institute in the wake of Scheer’s announcement shows Canadians – whether core Conservative voters or those who might vote CPC – want to see the party move closer to the political centre.
For six-in-ten Canadians overall (60%), that means taking climate change more seriously, and taking a more progressive stance on social values (57%). In each case, four-in-ten Core Conservatives agree.
Overall, Canadians are divided evenly over who was ultimately to blame for the party failing to form government. Exactly 50 per cent say that Andrew Scheer is primarily to blame, while 50 per cent say it was the party and its policies – not the outgoing leader – that bears responsibility.
As to who should shepherd the party into the next federal election, two names emerge from a cluttered field. Both former interim leader Rona Ambrose and former cabinet minister Peter MacKay are at the top. That said, Ambrose appears to be the top preference among both core Conservatives and those who aren’t committed to the party. By contrast, MacKay is a less appealing choice among committed CPC voters.
The Angus Reid Institute (ARI) was founded in October 2014 by pollster and sociologist, Dr. Angus Reid. ARI is a national, not-for-profit, non-partisan public opinion research foundation established to advance education by commissioning, conducting and disseminating to the public accessible and impartial statistical data, research and policy analysis on economics, political science, philanthropy, public administration, domestic and international affairs and other socio-economic issues of importance to Canada and its world.
Among the questions put to Canadians by Angus Reid Institute for the purposes of this report (view the questionnaire here) respondents were asked whether or not they would vote for any of the major federal parties. Each person was able to choose whether, in a future election, they would:
When it comes to the Conservative Party:
As Andrew Scheer is relegated to the status of interim leader while his party looks for a new chief and a winning direction, even recent supporters are pleased to see him replaced. Asked how they feel about his resignation, few say they are upset, and those who supported him just two months ago are twice as likely to say that they are pleased than unhappy:
Opinions on Scheer’s resignation are near uniform across age and gender. This is notable, as the Conservative Party itself often receives higher support from men over the age of 35:
That said, there is equal blame to go around when it comes to the party’s result on election night. Asked whether they believe Scheer shoulders the blame or whether the party is responsible more broadly, equal numbers say that each was the primary problem.
Notably, those who are more inclined to support the party are more likely to say that it was Scheer who caused the CPC to fall short, while those who say they would never support the party lean the other way, suggesting that the CPC’s policies need to change. That said, a significant segment of Core and Possible Conservatives take issue with the party’s policies:
The idea that the Conservative Party needs to change direction has picked up momentum in recent months. Some have suggested that Conservative positions on climate change and social values, in particular, are holding the party back. Angus Reid Institute polling finds considerable support for climate change action, for example, among those who prefer the CPC to other parties.
Related: Majorities say both climate action, oil & gas growth should be top priorities for govt.
These data suggest that political observers may be on to something. Six-in-ten Core Conservatives (57%) say that the party needs to move toward the political centre on social issues:
Overall, six-in-ten Canadians say that the party needs to take climate change more seriously. This sentiment is held by 37 per cent of Core Conservatives, and close to half of those who are Possible Conservatives (46%).
At least 38 per cent of all groups in the CPC sphere say the party is too socially conservative on issues such as gay rights. This suggests that the party has room for growth if it does indeed move to the centre on some issues:
When it comes to asking respondents whether they feel the CPC does a good job of reflecting their part of the country, the disparities are staggering. Three-quarters of residents in Alberta and Saskatchewan feel well-represented, while just one-quarter of B.C. and Ontario residents, and fewer than one-in-five in Quebec and Atlantic Canada say the same:
The focus of the Conservative Party now turns to its forthcoming leadership race. The Angus Reid Institute showed respondents a list of known and high-profile members of the conservative community and asked them to choose which would be most appealing – or write in a name of their own. In the aftermath of Scheer’s resignation, two prominent conservatives are preferred above others.
Both former interim CPC leader Rona Ambrose and former Conservative cabinet minister Peter MacKay generate interest from at least one-in-five Canadians. Perhaps more importantly, Ambrose is the top choice for both Core and Possible Conservatives:
After an election campaign that revealed deep and festering regional rifts, finding a leader who can resonate with Canadians cost-to-coast may be key in a Conservative returning the government. In is notable then, that while Ontario residents are split between Ambrose (28%) and MacKay (25%), it Ambrose who holds a distinct advantage in key CPC strongholds of Alberta and Saskatchewan and, to a lesser extent, B.C.:
But in a race that seems – for now – as wide open as it is fluid – what happens when Canadians are asked to narrow in on their most appealing choice? Here, Ambrose claims top spot:
As Justin Trudeau surveys the political fallout of an election that saw him holding onto his job by his fingernails, he does so with a less-than-optimal approval rating from his constituents. Currently, 36 per cent of Canadians say they approve of the job he has done to this point. His approval drops to one-in-five in Alberta and Saskatchewan, and jumps to two-in-five in regions east of Manitoba, as seen in the following regional graph:
That said, the picture is arguably no bleaker than it has been for his some of his more recent predecessors. Just after the four-year mark of their times as Prime Minister, both Brian Mulroney (29%) and Stephen Harper (33%) had lower approval, while Jean Chretien continued to garner majority support (57%):
Trudeau’s approval doldrums are attributable near-equally to all age categories. His personal brand has yet to recover with young Canadians who approved of him at majority levels until June of 2018.
Throughout the federal election campaign, climate change held the top position among important issues facing the country. That continues to be the case as the Liberals begin to tackle legislative priorities for this term. Climate change and health care emerge as clear priorities, while personal taxation, affordable housing and government transparency are all chosen by approximately one-in-five Canadians:
Justin Trudeau’s government has some hard work ahead, given that half of Canadians (49%) say the country is headed in the wrong direction. Major priorities such as health care, Canada-China relations and pushing NAFTA 2.0 across the finish line await the government in 2020. Success could go a long way to bringing skeptical Canadians over to the optimistic side of this equation, Failure, towards losing them even more.
Related: As unfavourable views of China rise, Canadians are split over wisdom of Meng arrest
As it stands now, Canadians in the eastern part of the country, Ontario (34%), Quebec (35%) and Atlantic Canada (34%), are most optimistic. In each case, these regions are twice as likely as Alberta to say the country is moving the right way (17%). Approximately seven-in-ten in Alberta and Saskatchewan say that the country is going in the wrong direction:
Politics plays a role in this sentiment: past Liberal voters like the direction in which the country is going generally, while past NDP voters are divided and perhaps waiting to see how this new minority government operates across party lines. Conservatives, meanwhile, are overwhelmingly negative – four-in-five (82%) say Canada is on the wrong track:
While parliamentarians adjust to the new minority government landscape, Canadians remain just as divided as they were when they voted October 21. Currently, 33 per cent say they would vote for the CPC if an election were called immediately, while 30 per cent would support the Liberals. The coming months will reveal how CPC leadership frontrunners could impact these numbers:
Part 1, Top Issues and Vote Intention: For detailed results by age, gender, region, education, and other demographics, click here.
Part 2: For detailed results by age, gender, region, education, and other demographics, click here
For detailed results by Conservative vote universe, click here.
To read the full report, including detailed tables and methodology, click here.
Click here to read the full questionnaire used in this report.
Shachi Kurl, Executive Director: 604.908.1693 firstname.lastname@example.org @shachikurl
Dave Korzinski, Research Director: 250.899.0821 email@example.com
Source URL: http://angusreid.org/cpc-leadership-scheer-resignation/
Copyright ©2020 Angus Reid Institute unless otherwise noted.